Schools of thought

Absurdism

From the 1940s

Camus' philosophy of facing a meaningless universe with open eyes, refusing both despair and false comfort.

The core idea

Albert Camus located the absurd in a confrontation: we demand meaning, unity and clarity, and the universe answers with silence. Neither side is absurd alone; the absurd is the relationship.

There are three ways to respond. Suicide gives up. Religious or philosophical leaps of faith, philosophical suicide, pretend the conflict away. Camus recommended a third: to keep the absurd in full view and live anyway, in revolt, freedom and passion. His symbol is Sisyphus, forever pushing a rock up a hill, whom 'one must imagine happy'.

Camus rejected the label existentialist, objecting that existentialists also take a leap, towards history or freedom. Søren Kierkegaard, whom he criticised, is often seen as absurdism's precursor, since he described the same confrontation but answered it with faith.

What they hold

  • Humans seek meaning; the universe offers none that reason can find.
  • The absurd should be neither denied nor escaped.
  • Revolt, freedom and passion are the right responses.
  • Life can be lived fully, even joyfully, without ultimate meaning.

The main criticisms

Critics ask why, if nothing has ultimate meaning, revolt should be better than despair; Camus seems to smuggle values in. Religious thinkers reply that the demand for meaning is itself evidence that meaning exists. Others question whether the universe's 'silence' is a real problem or a confusion about what meaning would be.

Further reading