231 terms

Glossary

Every technical word on this site, defined plainly. Underlined terms anywhere on the site link here; hover over them to see the definition in place.

A

  • A priori and a posteriori

    Knowledge is a priori if it can be had independently of experience, like knowledge of arithmetic, and a posteriori if it depends on experience, like knowledge that it is raining.

    Wikipedia

  • A-theory of time

    The view that time really passes: there is an objective present, and events genuinely move from future to present to past. Opposed to the B-theory of time.

    On the A-theory, it is a real fact about the world, not just about your perspective, that now is now.

    Wikipedia · Is time real?

  • Ability hypothesis

    A physicalist reply to the knowledge argument: when Mary first sees red, she gains no new fact, only new abilities, to recognise, remember and imagine red.

    Proposed by Laurence Nemirow and developed by David Lewis.

    Appears in Mary's room

  • Absurdism

    The view, associated with Albert Camus, that the human search for meaning meets a silent universe, and that the right response is to live in full awareness of this rather than escape it.

    Wikipedia · Must we imagine Sisyphus happy?

  • Affirmation (of life)

    In Nietzsche, saying yes to one's life as a whole, including its suffering, so completely that one would will it to recur exactly as it was.

    Appears in Would you live your life again, forever?

  • Amor fati

    Latin for 'love of fate'. Nietzsche's ideal of wanting nothing to be different, not merely bearing what happens but loving it.

    Wikipedia · Would you live your life again, forever?

  • Anatta (not-self)

    The Buddhist teaching that there is no permanent, unchanging self; a person is a changing stream of physical and mental processes.

    Wikipedia · Is the self an illusion?

  • Animalism

    The view that each of us is a human animal, so that personal identity over time is the persistence of a biological organism, not of memories or psychology.

    Wikipedia · Are you the same person you were at eight?

  • Anthropic reasoning

    Reasoning that takes into account the fact that we exist to make an observation. For example, we should not be surprised to find the universe compatible with life, since we could not observe one that was not.

    Wikipedia · Are we living in a simulation?, The Fermi paradox

  • Apatheia

    The Stoic ideal of freedom from destructive passions such as fear, anger and craving. It is not indifference or numbness, but a calm based on correct judgement.

    Wikipedia · Should you only care about what you control?

  • Appearance and reality

    The distinction between how things seem to us and how they really are. Much of philosophy, from Plato's cave to the brain in a vat, turns on whether and how we can cross that gap.

    Appears in Plato's cave

  • Authenticity

    In existentialism, living according to choices one recognises as one's own, rather than hiding behind roles, conventions or excuses.

    Wikipedia · Are you born with a nature?

B

  • B-theory of time

    The view that there is no objective present or flow of time. Events are simply earlier than, later than or simultaneous with one another, and 'now' is like 'here'. Usually paired with eternalism.

    Wikipedia · Is time real?

  • Backward induction

    Reasoning from the last step of a sequence backwards to the first, ruling out options one at a time. It drives the unexpected hanging paradox and many results in game theory.

    Wikipedia · The unexpected hanging

  • Bad faith

    Sartre's term for self-deception about our own freedom: pretending that we are fixed things, determined by roles or circumstances, in order to avoid responsibility for our choices.

    Sartre's example is a café waiter who plays at being a waiter as if he had no choice.

    Wikipedia · Are you born with a nature?

  • Bayesianism

    The view that rational belief comes in degrees, measured as probabilities, and that we should update those degrees on new evidence according to Bayes' theorem.

    Wikipedia · Why trust that the future will be like the past?

  • Biological naturalism

    John Searle's view that consciousness is a real, subjective biological phenomenon caused by brain processes, as digestion is caused by the stomach, and that running a program cannot by itself produce it.

    Wikipedia · Could a machine be conscious?, Could you upload your mind?

  • Block universe

    The picture, suggested by relativity, of past, present and future as equally real parts of a single four-dimensional spacetime, with no moving present.

    Wikipedia · Is time real?

  • Boltzmann brain

    A hypothetical self-aware brain that forms by a random fluctuation out of disorder, complete with false memories. Some cosmological models predict such brains should vastly outnumber ordinary observers.

    Wikipedia · Are you a Boltzmann brain?

  • Borderline case

    A case where it is unclear whether a vague word applies, such as whether a man with a certain number of hairs is bald.

    Appears in The sorites paradox

  • Bounded utility

    The view that there is an upper limit to how good any outcome can be for a person, so that no promised reward can be large enough to outweigh every tiny probability.

    Appears in Pascal's mugging, The St. Petersburg paradox

  • Branch-line case

    Derek Parfit's variant of the teleporter in which the original survives for a short while alongside the replica, forcing the question of which, if either, is you.

    Appears in Would you step into the teleporter?

  • Branching timeline

    A model of time travel in which changing the past creates a new, separate history, so the traveller's original past remains intact elsewhere.

    Appears in The grandfather paradox

  • Brute fact

    A fact that has no explanation; it is simply so. Whether the existence of the universe is a brute fact is a central question in cosmological arguments.

    Wikipedia · Why is there something rather than nothing?

  • Bundle theory

    The view, classically stated by David Hume, that the self is nothing over and above a bundle of perceptions, thoughts and feelings, with no further owner.

    Wikipedia · Is the self an illusion?

C

  • Cartesian circle

    The charge that Descartes argues in a circle: he uses clear and distinct ideas to prove that God exists, then relies on God to guarantee that clear and distinct ideas are reliable.

    Wikipedia · What if a demon deceived you about everything?

  • Categorical imperative

    Kant's supreme principle of morality, a command that binds everyone regardless of their desires. In one form: act only on a rule you could will to be a universal law. In another: treat humanity always as an end, never merely as a means.

    Wikipedia · What makes an action right?

  • Causal closure of the physical

    The principle that every physical event that has a cause has a sufficient physical cause. If true, it leaves no obvious room for a non-physical mind to make a difference.

    Wikipedia · Is the mind just the brain?

  • Causal decision theory

    The theory that you should choose the act whose effects you expect to be best, ignoring correlations your choice does not cause. It recommends taking both boxes in Newcomb's problem.

    Wikipedia · Newcomb's problem

  • Causal loop

    A chain of events that causes itself, such as an object or piece of information carried back in time that becomes its own origin.

    Wikipedia · The grandfather paradox, The bootstrap paradox

  • Causation

    The relation between a cause and its effect. Philosophers disagree about whether it is a real necessary connection or, as Hume argued, just regular succession that we have learned to expect.

    Wikipedia · Is the future already fixed?

  • Chaos (deterministic)

    Behaviour of a fully deterministic system that is so sensitive to its starting conditions that long-term prediction is practically impossible.

    Weather is chaotic: a tiny measurement error grows until forecasts beyond a couple of weeks are useless.

    Wikipedia · Could a perfect mind predict everything?

  • Closed timelike curve

    A path through spacetime that returns to its own past. Some solutions to Einstein's equations of general relativity allow them, which is why physicists take time travel puzzles seriously.

    Wikipedia · The grandfather paradox, The bootstrap paradox

  • Closure principle

    The principle that if you know something, and know that it implies something else, you know that other thing too. Sceptical arguments often rely on it.

    Wikipedia · How do you know anything at all?, Are you a brain in a vat?

  • Coercion

    Forcing someone to act by threat or pressure. Whether a coerced action is free, and whether the person is responsible for it, is a test case for theories of freedom.

    Appears in Can you be free in a determined universe?

  • Cogito

    Short for 'cogito, ergo sum', I think, therefore I am. Descartes' claim that one thing survives all doubt: the existence of the one who is doubting.

    Wikipedia · What if a demon deceived you about everything?

  • Cognitive instability

    The property of a theory that, if believed, undermines your reasons for believing it. A cosmology predicting that you are probably a Boltzmann brain is said to be cognitively unstable.

    Appears in Are you a Boltzmann brain?

  • Compatibilism

    The view that free will and moral responsibility are compatible with determinism. Freedom, on this view, is acting on your own reasons and desires without compulsion, not escaping the laws of nature.

    Wikipedia · Is free will an illusion?, Can you be free in a determined universe?, Could you be responsible without any alternatives?

  • Conceivability argument

    An argument from the claim that something can be coherently imagined to the claim that it is possible. Zombie arguments against physicalism depend on it.

    Appears in Could there be a zombie you?

  • Confabulation

    Producing a confident but false explanation of one's own behaviour or memories without intending to deceive. Split-brain studies offer famous examples.

    Appears in Two minds in one head?

  • Consequentialism

    The family of moral theories holding that whether an act is right depends only on its consequences. Utilitarianism is the best-known member.

    Wikipedia · What makes an action right?, The trolley problem

  • Contextualism

    In epistemology, the view that the standards for counting as 'knowing' shift with the context of conversation, so that the sceptic raises the standards rather than refuting ordinary knowledge.

    Wikipedia · How do you know anything at all?

  • Contingent

    True or existing, but able to have been otherwise. Opposed to necessary.

    That you are reading this is contingent; that two plus two is four is not.

    Wikipedia · Why is there something rather than nothing?

  • Continuum

    A space or quantity with no gaps, such as the real number line, in which between any two points there are infinitely many more.

    Wikipedia · Zeno's paradoxes

D

  • Decision theory

    The formal study of how to choose rationally under uncertainty, usually by weighing outcomes by their probabilities and values.

    Wikipedia · Newcomb's problem, Pascal's mugging

  • Decoherence

    The process by which a quantum system's interaction with its environment makes interference between its possibilities practically undetectable, so that it appears to behave classically.

    Wikipedia · Are there other versions of you?

  • Deduction

    Reasoning in which, if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true. Contrasted with induction, which only makes its conclusion probable.

    Wikipedia · Why trust that the future will be like the past?

  • Demandingness objection

    The objection that a moral theory, often utilitarianism, asks too much of us, for example by requiring us to give away nearly everything to help others.

    Wikipedia · The drowning child

  • Deontology

    The family of moral theories holding that some acts are required or forbidden in themselves, whatever their consequences, because of duties, rights or constraints.

    Wikipedia · What makes an action right?, The trolley problem

  • Deprivation account

    The view that death is bad for the one who dies because it deprives them of the goods they would otherwise have had.

    Appears in Should we fear death?

  • Desert

    Deserving something, such as praise, blame, reward or punishment, because of what one has done. 'Basic desert' is desert that does not depend on the good consequences of giving it.

    Appears in Can anyone deserve blame?

  • Desire-satisfaction theory

    The theory that a person's life goes well to the extent that their desires, or the desires they would have if fully informed, are fulfilled.

    Appears in Would you plug into the experience machine?

  • Determinism

    The thesis that the state of the world at any moment, together with the laws of nature, fixes everything that happens afterwards.

    Wikipedia · Is free will an illusion?, Is the future already fixed?, Can you be free in a determined universe?, Are there other versions of you?, Could a perfect mind predict everything?

  • Dialetheism

    The view that some contradictions are true: some statements, such as the liar sentence, are both true and false.

    Wikipedia · The liar paradox

  • Dichotomy of control

    The Stoic division of everything into what is up to us, our judgements, choices and desires, and what is not, everything else. Calm comes from caring only about the first.

    Wikipedia · Should you only care about what you control?

  • Difference principle

    Rawls' principle that social and economic inequalities are just only if they work to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged members of society.

    Wikipedia · The veil of ignorance

  • Diminishing marginal utility

    The principle that each additional unit of something, such as money, adds less value than the one before.

    A thousand pounds matters far more to someone with nothing than to a millionaire.

    Wikipedia · The St. Petersburg paradox

  • Doctrine of double effect

    The principle that it can be permissible to cause a harm as a foreseen side effect of pursuing a good end, when it would be wrong to cause the same harm as a means to that end.

    Wikipedia · The trolley problem

  • Doing and allowing

    The distinction between causing a harm and merely letting it happen. Many people think doing harm is worse than allowing it, even when the outcome is the same.

    Appears in The trolley problem

  • Dominance principle

    The rule that if one option gives a better result than another whatever else is true of the world, you should choose it.

    Wikipedia · Newcomb's problem

  • Drake equation

    A formula proposed by Frank Drake in 1961 that multiplies estimates such as the rate of star formation and the fraction of planets that develop life to estimate how many communicating civilisations exist in our galaxy.

    Wikipedia · The Fermi paradox

E

F

G

  • Gettier problem

    The challenge, raised by Edmund Gettier in 1963, of explaining why a justified true belief that is true only by luck does not count as knowledge.

    Wikipedia · Is knowledge just justified true belief?

  • Grandfather paradox

    The apparent contradiction of travelling back in time and preventing your own birth, for example by stopping your grandparents from meeting.

    Wikipedia · The grandfather paradox

  • Great Filter

    Robin Hanson's idea that some step on the road from dead matter to galaxy-spanning civilisation is extremely improbable, which would explain the silence of the sky.

    Wikipedia · The Fermi paradox

H

I

J

K

  • Knowledge

    In the sense philosophers usually study, knowing that something is the case. At minimum it requires true belief; exactly what else it needs is disputed.

    Wikipedia · Mary's room, The unexpected hanging

  • Knowledge argument

    Frank Jackson's argument from Mary's room: someone could know every physical fact about colour and still learn something new on seeing red, so not all facts are physical.

    Wikipedia · Mary's room

L

  • Laplace's demon

    An imagined intellect that knows every particle's position and every force at one moment, and so could calculate the entire past and future. A symbol of determinism.

    Wikipedia · Could a perfect mind predict everything?

  • Law of non-contradiction

    The principle that a statement and its negation cannot both be true at the same time and in the same sense.

    Wikipedia · The liar paradox

  • Laws of nature

    The basic regularities, or the principles behind them, that govern how the physical world behaves, such as the conservation of energy.

    Wikipedia · Is the future already fixed?

  • Libertarianism (free will)

    The view that we have free will and that free will requires indeterminism, so determinism is false. Unrelated to political libertarianism.

    Wikipedia · Is free will an illusion?

  • Liberty of indifference

    A will's supposed power to choose between options when it has no reason to prefer either, as in Buridan's donkey.

    Appears in Buridan's donkey

  • Limit (mathematics)

    The value a sequence or sum approaches ever more closely as it goes on. Modern mathematics uses limits to make sense of infinite sums and motion.

    Wikipedia · Zeno's paradoxes

M

  • Maximin

    A rule for choosing under uncertainty: pick the option whose worst possible outcome is better than the worst outcome of every alternative.

    Wikipedia · The veil of ignorance

  • Means and side effects

    The distinction between harm you bring about as a way of achieving your goal and harm that is merely a foreseen by-product of achieving it. Central to the doctrine of double effect.

    Appears in The trolley problem

  • Measurement problem

    The puzzle in quantum mechanics of why measurements yield single definite results when the theory's equations describe a superposition of all possible results.

    Wikipedia · Are there other versions of you?

  • Mereology

    The study of parts and wholes: when several things make up one thing, and whether a whole is anything over and above its parts.

    Wikipedia · The Ship of Theseus

  • Metaethics

    The branch of ethics that asks what moral claims mean, whether they can be true, and how we could know them, rather than which things are right or wrong.

    Wikipedia · Is morality objective?

  • Metaphysics

    The branch of philosophy that asks about the basic nature of reality: what exists, what time, causation and identity are, and why there is anything at all.

    Wikipedia

  • Metastability

    In electronics, an unstable in-between state a circuit can get stuck in when two inputs arrive almost simultaneously and it must decide between them. A real-world cousin of Buridan's donkey.

    Wikipedia · Buridan's donkey

  • Method of doubt

    Descartes' strategy of setting aside every belief that can be doubted at all, in order to find something that cannot.

    Wikipedia · What if a demon deceived you about everything?

  • Mind-body problem

    The problem of how the mind, with its thoughts and feelings, is related to the body and brain.

    Wikipedia · Is the mind just the brain?

  • Moral distance

    The question of whether physical or social distance makes any difference to our obligations to help someone.

    Appears in The drowning child

  • Moral luck

    Cases where we judge people differently because of factors outside their control, such as two equally careless drivers, only one of whom happens to hit a child.

    Wikipedia · Can anyone deserve blame?

  • Moral realism

    The view that there are objective moral facts that hold independently of what anyone believes or feels.

    Wikipedia · Is morality objective?

  • Moral relativism

    The view that moral claims are true or false only relative to a culture or individual, with no standpoint-independent moral truth.

    Wikipedia · Is morality objective?

  • Moral responsibility

    Being the appropriate target of praise or blame for what one does.

    Wikipedia · Can anyone deserve blame?, Could you be responsible without any alternatives?

  • Moral status

    Mattering morally for one's own sake, so that others have reasons to consider one's interests.

    Appears in Do animals have moral rights?

  • Multiple realisability

    The idea that one kind of mental state, such as pain, could be produced by very different physical systems: human brains, octopus brains or perhaps silicon chips.

    Wikipedia · Is the mind just the brain?

N

O

  • Object language and metalanguage

    The distinction between a language being talked about (the object language) and the language used to talk about it (the metalanguage). Tarski used it to avoid the liar paradox.

    Wikipedia · The liar paradox

  • Objective list theory

    The theory that some things, such as knowledge, friendship and achievement, make a life go better whether or not the person wants or enjoys them.

    Appears in Would you plug into the experience machine?

  • Objective value

    Value that something has independently of anyone's attitudes towards it, as opposed to value it has only because someone cares about it.

    Appears in Does life have meaning without being given one?

  • Ockham's razor

    The principle that, other things being equal, the simpler explanation that posits fewer entities should be preferred.

    Wikipedia

  • Ontology

    The part of metaphysics that asks what kinds of things exist.

    Wikipedia

  • Original position

    Rawls' imagined situation in which people choose principles of justice from behind a veil of ignorance.

    Wikipedia · The veil of ignorance

P

Q

R

S

T

  • The absurd

    In Camus, the conflict between the human demand for meaning and the universe's silence in reply.

    Wikipedia · Does life have meaning without being given one?, Must we imagine Sisyphus happy?

  • Thought experiment

    An imagined scenario used to test a theory or draw out an intuition, without needing to carry it out.

    Wikipedia

  • Transitivity

    A relation is transitive if, whenever A stands in it to B and B to C, A stands in it to C. Identity is transitive; similarity is not.

    Wikipedia · Are you your memories?

  • Turing test

    Alan Turing's proposed test for machine intelligence: if a judge holding text conversations cannot reliably tell a machine from a human, the machine passes.

    Wikipedia · Could a machine be conscious?

  • Type theory

    A family of logical systems that sort objects into levels, or types, so that a collection can only contain things of a lower type. Russell devised it to block his paradox.

    Wikipedia · Russell's paradox

  • Typicality assumption

    The assumption that you should reason as if you are a typical member of the class of observers in your situation.

    Appears in Are you a Boltzmann brain?

Ü

U

V

W

Z

  • ZFC

    Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with the axiom of choice: the standard foundation of modern mathematics, which avoids Russell's paradox by restricting which sets can be formed.

    Wikipedia · Russell's paradox