Empiricism
17th and 18th centuries onward
The view that all our ideas and knowledge of the world come from experience.
The core idea
John Locke argued that the mind begins as a blank slate, with no innate ideas, and that everything we think is built from sensation and reflection. George Berkeley pushed this to the conclusion that there is no matter beyond our perceptions. David Hume followed it to sceptical conclusions about causation, the self and the problem of induction.
Empiricism is less a single theory than an attitude: claims about the world must answer to experience. In the nineteenth century John Stuart Mill built a logic of science on it, and in the twentieth it took a radical form in logical positivism. It remains the background philosophy of most scientific practice.
What they hold
- There are no innate ideas; the mind is furnished by experience.
- Knowledge of matters of fact depends on observation.
- Ideas that cannot be traced to experience are suspect or meaningless.
- Reason alone tells us only about relations between ideas.
The main criticisms
Rationalists reply that experience alone cannot account for knowledge of necessary truths, such as those of mathematics. Hume's own results show the risk: strict empiricism seems to leave us unable to justify induction, causation or belief in an external world.
Key figures
Where it comes up
Further reading
- EncyclopediaStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Rationalism vs. Empiricism
- WikipediaEmpiricism